Will Westminster force fracking on Lancashire?

P1090695 - Copy

Last year I participated in the protests against fracking at Roseacre and Preston New Road (in Little Plumpton) outside Preston’s County Hall in June. On Thursday 25th June, Lancashire’s Development Control committee rejected the proposal for Roseacre 15-0.

After an incredibly fraught week during which decisions were delayed by a piece of legal advice designed to persuade the councillors rejecting the proposal on the grounds of ‘landscape, visual and amenity impact’ was ‘illegal’ rather than ‘unreasonable’ they voted against Little Plumpton 9-4 with 2 abstentions.

Local communities saw this as a massive victory not only against fracking but for democracy. We were heartened by the fact that, in spite of being put under tremendous pressure, Lancashire’s councillors had listened to their people and stood for their views.

Predictably Cuadrilla have appealed. On 27th November 2015 it was announced that, following the decisions of Lancashire’s councillors to refuse fracking, further decisions would be transferred to Westminster. The final call will be made by Greg Clark, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.

Clark has stood for decentralisation and called on county councillors to ‘take the power back’. However The Telegraph recently published a leaked letter written on 7th July 2015 proposing classifying fracking sites as ‘nationally significant infrastructure’ and outlining objectives to ‘develop the shale gas sector’. The signatories were Liz Truss (Environment Secretary), Amber Rudd (Energy and Climate Change) and… Greg Clark. It is alarmingly clear where Clark’s priorities lie.


These issues provided the impetus for a public meeting: ‘Will Westminster force fracking on Lancashire?’ last night at St John’s Minster in Preston. This event brought national and local anti-fracking groups together with members of the public to hear a series of panellists and engage in debate.

The event was chaired by Rose Dickinson from Friends of the Earth. Barbara Richardson from the Roseacre Awareness Group spoke for the Fylde’s unspoilt scenery and important role in agriculture and tourism against preconceptions of ‘the desolate north’.

The speech of Pat Davies from Preston New Road Action Group drove home the massive amount of work ordinary people with no background in the area had put into researching fracking and legislation in order to put Cuadrilla’s plans into question.

Stephen Gared from the Environment Group for the Anglican and Catholic Diocese in the North West highlighted the importance of transparency and drew attention to misleading wording used by fracking corporations and called for ‘the truth and nothing but the truth’.

Stephen Holgate, Labour Councillor for Chorley West, raised the issue of predetermination in relation to the leaked letter and Clark’s cohesion with George Osborne’s plans to fast track fracking. He also spoke of the importance of protecting democracy and making sure councillors and politicians know if they do not listen to their people they will lose seats.

Tina Louise Rotherby of the Fracking Nannas told us about the numerous lies she had uncovered and the lack of reassurance about what will happen to waste left underground when the frackers are gone.

Asad Rahman, an international climate change campaigner for Friends of the Earth, highlighted how the UK government’s proposals to frack go against the agreement reached at Paris to reduce global warming to below 2°C which means 80% of fossil fuels must be left underground, and drew attention to the ongoing human cost of climate change.

Questions raised during the debate included whether, if local people’s opposition was ignored, a case could be taken to the European Court of Human Rights. Pam Davies said if that happened she intended to take her community’s case to a judicial review and to Europe if necessary. Other points addressed were the possibility of councils standing against central government and how to gain the support of local businesses.

The decision making process begins on Tuesday 9th February at Blackpool Football Stadium and will last around 20 days over 4 weeks. According to the draft programme in the first week Cuadrilla will state their case with support from consultancy firm Arup. In the second week the North and Western Lancashire Chamber of Commerce will support Cuadrilla then Lancashire County Council will defend its decisions.

On the third and fourth weeks Friends of the Earth, Roseacre, the Preston New Road groups and local parish councils will state their opposition followed by hearings from the members of the public. Inspector Wendy McKay will then report back to Greg Clark who will make the final decision.

Frack Free Lancashire are organising a national anti-fracking demonstration outside Blackpool Football Stadium beginning at 9am on Tuesday morning encouraging people across the UK to gather in solidarity.


Once again the final decision will be not only of national but global importance. The result will determine whether Greg Clark and Westminster are open to the views of local people and respectful of the decisions of county councillors or determined to force fracking on Lancashire at the expense of democracy.

6 thoughts on “Will Westminster force fracking on Lancashire?

    1. Certainly part if it. I don’t think Lancashire people or councils could have guessed it was meant so literally! Interestingly the dependence of the Northern Powerhouse on fracking is only mentioned once in this new document, although, admittedly its focus is transport with that Ribble Bridge down for completion in 2024. My hope is that if fracking can be prevented this will be an impediment to funding future developments http://www.lancashirelep.co.uk/media/26203/4412-lancs-strat-transport_web.pdf

  1. I see that plans to frack in Cheshire have been scrapped by the frackers on the grounds that they can’t make it pay. Fracking is only viable when oil prices are high, and currently, the market is against them. it sickens me that it will likely come down to the issue of profit, but at the same time, if the issue of profit can protect the land – its still a way of winning.

    1. Yeah, I’m wondering whether similar arguments could work our favour here. I’ll bet the speakers appealing against fracking here are well up on this and it will also be on Cuadrilla’s minds. Heartlifting anyhow Cheshire have had a victory and I think this will provide hope for everyone protesting against the sites at Roseacre and Little Plumpton.

  2. alyson black

    I wish you every success with the anti-fracking campaign. Here in the south, councillors have also voted against fracking and it is shocking to hear that decisions may be taken out of their hands. I am disgusted that considering the visual impact on a landscape is deemed illegal! My blood is boiling and we must not let these fools get away with their insistence on fracking which is wrong on so many levels. Many of the politicians pushing for this have shares in the fracking companies, which surely is a ‘conflict of interest’ and they should not be allowed to vote if they stand to profit. All the best, Alyson

    Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:33:14 +0000 To: alysonjblack@hotmail.com

    1. Thanks Alyson, my sentiments entirely. If after the victory at Chester the sites at Roseacre and Little Plumpton get turned down hopefully this will provide hope and inspiration for folk fighting fracking in the south too.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s